While a night court could provide additional hearing hours in criminal cases, it would also fiscally impact the budgets of the Sheriff’s Department, the Prosecutor’s Office and the Public Defender’s Office. Salzmann: The report recognized a night court as an issue that could not be adequately addressed for implementation in the immediate future due to its complexity and the budgetary limitations of the county. By creating a night court, not only are we providing a legitimate service to the people, but we are providing a solid benefit to the overall operation of the court system. Small Claims court should have both a day and night court. In some cases, even if for court proceedings, individuals face the possibility of losing their job, but definitely a loss of their income. It would also reduce the stress on the courts during normal business hours. It would allow individuals to have access to the clerk’s office without taking time off work to do so. The primary benefit in having a night court would be to improve the services that the courts provide to the public by increasing public access to the courts. In the Criminal Justice Study, it points out several purposes for a night court: capacity to hear cases, increased public access to the courts, help reduce backlogs and delays and reducing the need to build more courtrooms. Lamb: I am a strong supporter of night court. What do you think of the possibility of extending court hours past 4 p.m., as a way to assist plaintiffs and defendants who have day jobs and as a way to unclog the slow courts? That same study suggested that the establishment of a night court system in Monroe County is a good idea. The newly elected Judge will be just one of nine on the board and must work collaboratively with that body to make changes to the administration of justice in this community. However, both of these suggestions also involve coordinated evaluation and action among the Board of Judges. Both of these suggestions would likely serve to reduce the length that cases are pending in our local courts. Those two strategies were to have the court implement a four-step process to analyze reasons for delays and how to control them and to implement a differentiated case management system. More: Here are the key races to watch in Indiana's 2022 midterm election Attorneys and staff are more likely to move the cases through quicker if they know judges will be adhering closely to a strict and firm, but “fair” schedule for case progression. That way, if case management plans are not being followed, the courts have the ability to dismiss the cases that need and should be dismissed. Trial Rule 41(E), failure to timely prosecute cases, should be used and followed closely. Lamb: All courts should use case management plans, which would set out a specific schedule for the progression of a case from filing to the trial date. How would you go about making the court system more efficient in this regard? The county-commissioned report suggested ways to move cases along more quickly. Lamb is a local attorney with a practice, Carl Lamb and Associates, a Marine Corps veteran, a graduate of the IU's law school and has worked as the Monroe County attorney.Ī recent study of the court system showed that cases, civil and criminal, linger much longer than they should, often for years. Salzmann is a graduate of IU Maurer School of Law, a partner in Salzmann Law LLC, has served as judge pro tempore numerous times and has held leadership roles with the Monroe County Bar Association. The Herald-Times presented three questions to Republican Carl Lamb and Democrat Emily Salzmann, candidates for Monroe Circuit Court judge in the Nov.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |